Home | Navigation | About | Contact | Credits | Feedback 

  Search
  ..................................
  Select Level of Detail
     At a Glance
     General
     Technical
  ............................
+ Mill Residues
- Secondary Mill Residues
  ............................
  Access BioWeb Content
    Search
    Explore By Topic
    Browse Index
  ............................
  BioWeb Glossary
    Search
    Alphabetical Listing
  ............................ 
  Contributors Log in
  

bioweb.sungrant.org » General » Biomass Resources » Forest Resources » Mill Residues » Secondary Mill Residues

Secondary Mill Residues
Printer Friendly

The U.S. forestry industry, in the process of harvesting and converting wood into consumer products, generates a number of residue and waste materials that could be used for bioenergy and bioproducts. Secondary mills utilize the products from primary mills to produce other products (e.g., convert board lumber into furniture, cabinets, etc.). While primary and secondary mills are typically separate facilities, both primary wood processing and secondary conversion to finished consumer products can occur in the same facility. 

 

Few estimates exist regarding the amount of secondary mill residues that are generated. This type of data is not routinely collected and must be estimated, generally by multiplying the number of employees by a waste generation factor (often lbs of waste/employee). Little data is available regarding appropriate waste generation factors and the quality and type of employment data is often suspect. Use of SIC codes to identify companies often leads to misidentification due either to double counting of companies 

listed under more than one SIC code or inclusion or exclusion of companies entering or leaving the industry resulting from delay in compiling SIC data (Buggeln, 2002). 

 

Rooney (1998) estimated that 12.5 million dry tons of secondary mill wood residues are generated, but that only 1.2 million dry tons could be available for bioenergy after correcting for assumed recoverability factors, percent of residues contaminated, etc. No economic analysis was conducted.

 

 
  
  
  

 

      Author:   Marie Walsh
Last Modified: 5/14/2008
  
Copyright © 2007 Sun Grant Initiative and the University of Tennesee.  Full disclaimer and guide to usage available here.